RSS 1.0's strong point is its use of the RDF model, which
enables information to be represented in a consistent fashion. This
model is backed by a formal specification which provides
well-defined semantics. From this point of view, RSS 1.0 becomes
just another vocabulary that uses the framework. In contrast,
outside of the relationships between the handful of
syndication-specific terms defined in its specification, RSS 2.0
simply doesn't have a model. There's no consistent means of
interpreting material from other namespaces that may appear in an
RSS 2.0 document. It's a semantic void. But it doesn't have to be
that way since it's relatively straightforward to map to the RDF
framework and use that model.
The scope of applications is often extended, and depending on
how you look at it, it's either enhancement or feature creep.
Either way, it usually means diminishing returns -- the greater
distance from the core domain you get, the more additional work is
required for every new piece of functionality. But if you look at
the web as one big application, then we can to get a lot
more functionality with only a little more effort.
1 to 4 of 4
Postscript
2004-08-18 02:53:28 Danny Ayers
real-world use?
2003-08-03 11:42:58 Bob DuCharme
real-world use?
2003-08-03 23:38:44 Danny Ayers
Extending RSS 2.0
2003-07-24 05:01:43 Danny Ayers
ssr namespace declaration
2003-07-24 00:44:17 bryan rasmussen
ssr namespace declaration
2003-07-24 00:53:57 Edd Dumbill
1 to 4 of 4
,
战歌网
数据统计中!!